From The Times
July 14, 2007
The case against Conrad Black
Conrad Black was cleared of the most serious charge, racketeering, but still faces a long jail term
James Bone, Chicago
Lord Black’s fraud trial gave the world a glimpse into the lavish lifestyle of a press baron who even his own lawyer described as “different from you and me”.
Jurors heard about Black’s $4.6 million renovation of his Park Avenue flat, his $62,000 surprise 60th birthday for his wife at New York’s La Grenouille restaurant, and their trip together aboard the company G4 jet to the Pacific island of Bora Bora.
By the end of the 14-week trial the glitter had worn off. His fellow company director, Henry Kissinger, never came to the witness stand and the property mogul Donald Trump failed to make a much-anticipated appearance.
Prosecutors dropped plans to use a disc of 11,000 “marital e-mails” between Black and his wife.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The guts of the often-complex case was $14.8 million that Black received in so-called “non-compete” fees as the publicly-traded US company Hollinger International sold off its assets from 1998-2001.
“The Non-Competes" - 6 fraud charges (max 5 years each) - 3 guilty, 3 not guilty
After building the third largest newspaper empire in the world, Black decided in the late 1990s to sell off most the company’s titles in the US and Canada. Prosecutors charged that as he did so, he and other top executives siphoned off more than $60 million dollars in bogus “non-compete” payments in return for promising the buyers that they would not to set up rival publications.
In one deal, according to prosecutors, Black got paid not to compete with himself because he part-owned the company that paid the fee. In another, the government said, he never signed a “non-compete” pledge but took the money anyway. In a third deal, the buyer flatly refused to wire the money directly to him, so one of Black’s co-accused hand-wrote his name onto the bank transfer.
Prosecutors conceded that Black was entitled to the $12 million “non-compete” fee he received from the sale of The National Post, the Canadian daily he founded. But they charged that he also diverted some of the sale proceeds to fellow executives.
Racketeering - 1 charge (max 20 years) Not guilty
Prosecutors argued that the repeated payment of “non-competes” showed a pattern of “racketeering activity” - a charge more commonly associated with crime families and street gangs. To reach a guilty verdict on racketeering, the jury had to find that two or more linked frauds took place.
Tax Fraud - 2 charges (Max 3 years each) Not guilty
Because of the alleged diversion of the “non-compete” money, Black was also charged with causing false tax returns to be filed in 2000 and 2001.
Perks - 3 charges (max 5 years each) - Not guilty
(A) THE PARTY: Black was also accused of using $40,000 of company money to throw a $62,000 surprise birthday 60th birthday party for his wife at New York’s La Grenouille restaurant on December 4, 2000, with a guest list that included six billionaires;
(B) THE BORA BORA TRIP: Black was charged with billing the company with half the cost of using the corporate jet for a 23 hour round-trip flight to a holiday with his wife on the French Polynesian island of Bora Bora;
(C) THE PARK AVENUE CORPORATE FLAT: Black was accused of buying the corporate flat on New York’s Park Avenue in 2000 at a below-market price of $3 million - the same price the company had purchased it for six years earlier.
Obstruction of Justice - 1 charge (max 20 years) - Guilty
Shortly after 5 pm on May 20, 2005, Black was captured on CCTV moving 13 boxes of files out of his Toronto office into his car - just one day after his lawyers had received a fax warning them that the US stock market regulator would soon be requesting documents from him. The boxes were eventually returned - but not before the grainy CCTV pictures were broadcast repeatedly in Canada.

Lord Black of Crossharbour once controlled a majority of the newspapers in Canada: he now faces a lengthy jail sentence
Multimedia
Background
Related Internet Links
Related Links
Here they come
Video, pictures and analysis of David and Victoria as they arrive in the US
THE TIMES TODAY
Today
Timeline: rise and fall of Lord Black
Conrad Black, his wife Barbara Amiel and daughter Alana
James Bone, Chicago
1944 Black born to affluent Canadian family
1959 Expelled from prestigious Upper Canada College for selling exam papers
1965 Gains history BA
1971 Profitably sells the Sherbrooke Record newspaper in Quebec, a money-losing publication bought in 1969, and buys more titles
1978 At just 33, Black acquires control of Canada's largest and best known conglomerate, Argus Corp Ltd, and further invests in newspapers
1985 Acquires Daily Telegraph
1990 Following earlier out-of-court victories, Penguin destroys 6,200 copies of a book criticising Black after he begins libel proceedings
1992 Marries second wife Barbara Amiel, a columnist at The Times
1996 Black's media empire peaks as world's largest print-only operation. Over 500 publications worldwide include Israel's Jerusalem Post, the Chicago Sun-Times and 59 of Canada’s 105 dailies
1998 Black launches Canada's National Post. Fails to become major daily despite CA$200m (£94m) spending over nine years
2000 Increasingly indebted, Black sells a number of Canadian newspapers
2001 Renounces Canadian citizenship to join Britain's House of Lords on Margaret Thatcher’s nomination
2003 Investment firm Tweedy Browne Co writes to HI, Black's holding company, and the US regulator, alleging excessive payments to Black. Black resigns after an HI committee reports that the company made US$32.15m (£15.1m) of irregular payments
2004 Amiel loses Telegraph column; paper acquired by Barclay brothers. US regulator report says Black ran 'corporate kleptocracy'
2005 Black indicted for fraud. Former employee David Radler pleads guilty, offers to testify for prosecution
March 14, 2007 Trial begins in Chicago. Black and 3 co-defendants charged with diverting $60 million in funds
20 March Prosecution compares Black to a bank robber in a tie
31 March-1 April, 2007 During trial break, Black attends literary party in Canada despite travel restrictions
May 24, 2007 Jury told that Black secretly enlisted Donald Trump to speak in his favour at shareholder meeting
June 27 Jury begins considering verdict
July 13 Jury finds Black guilty of four of 13 charges
Source: Times archive
Conrad Black, pictured as owner of the Daily Telegraph on June 1, 1992: the tycoon's newspaper empire was at one stage the biggest in the world (Mark Ellidge/The Sunday Times)
Canadian Governor General Romeo LeBlanc (l) and Black (r) await the arrival of the Queen for a ceremony marking the consecration of new Colours on the Regiment in Ottawa, Canada, on July 3, 1997 (Peter Jones/Reuters)
Black and his wife Barbara Amiel at a party on September 16, 2000: the lavish lifestyle enjoyed by the couple was legendary (Reuters/Shaun Best)
The headlines on January 19, 2004, as key titles owned by Black are bought by billionaire tycoons David and Frederick Barclay, including the Daily Telegraph newspaper (Reuters/Peter Macdiarmid) Jan 19th 2004
The Blacks at their house in Palm Beach, Florida. Black funded a lavish lifestyle, but the jury found him not guilty of anything illegal over company perks
Black leaves the US District Courthouse in Chicago on June 27, as the jury started deliberations in his fraud trial (AFP/Jeff Haynes)
The Black family: Conrad with his daughter Alana, centre, and wife Barbara Amiel. They presented a united front throughout the trial
A sketch shows Black sitting before Judge Amy St. Eve in the US District Courthouse in Chicago on June 27 (M.Spencer Green/AP)
Black leaves the US District Courthouse in Chicago on June 27 as the jury retires to consider its verdicts (EPA/Tannen Maury)
Lord Black breaks a habit and stays silent in defence
James Bone in Chicago
Lord Black of Crossharbour plans to stay silent as his lawyers present an unexpectedly brief defence at his fraud trial.
Edward Genson, the former press baron’s lawyer, told the judge that he would take just two half-days to rebut 11 weeks of prosecution evidence, which concluded yesterday.
In the first public indication that the normally loquacious Lord Black does not plan to testify, Mr Genson said that he had no witness for today and would conclude on Monday.
Lord Black’s apparent decision not to testify suggests that his lawyers believe they have already poked enough holes in the prosecution’s case to win an acquittal. But they may also be wary of subjecting Lord Black to cross-examination about the millions of dollars he and other senior Hollinger executives received in “non-compete” payments.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Lord Black will rely instead on favourable testimony from Joan Maida, his long-time personal assistant, and Ken Whyte, the former editor of the National Post in Canada, which Lord Black set up.
Ms Maida also served on the board of the Black Family Foundation and ordered 150 “Conrad will win!” T-shirts for her boss before the trial.
Mr Whyte, now the editor of Maclean’s magazine in Canada, was first hired by Lord Black to be editor of Saturday Night magazine in the mid-1990s. He is a personal friend of the former Telegraph chairman and employs Barbara Amiel, Lord Black’s wife, as a columnist on Maclean’s.
Lord Black, 62, could spend the rest of his life behind bars and face heavy fines if convicted of looting $60 million from the Hollinger International newspaper empire.
Prosecutors yesterday dropped one of the 14 charges which related to alleged money laundering. Lord Black’s lawyers said they planned to request that the remaining charges be dismissed.
The prosecution sought to end on a flourish yesterday by producing bank statements showing Lord Black’s lavish spending on jewellery and fashion for his wife.
Within days of receiving $8.4 million and $4.3 million payments into the account, Lord Black spent $2.62 million at Graff Diamonds, $80,067 at Balmain, $71,097 at Gaultier, $116,117 at Yves Saint Laurent, and $101,550 at Fendi.
Among the final prosecution witnesses was a New York property expert who told the court that Lord Black was given a $5.5 million discount when he bought a corporate flat on Manhattan’s Upper East Side from the company.
Jonathan Miller said that the flat, which was in Park Avenue, was worth far more than the $3 million Lord Black paid. Lord Black said that he spent $2 million to renovate it.
Mr Miller told the court: “It’s so far beyond where the market level is that it wouldn’t matter if it was renovated or unrenovated — a $3 million price point isn’t realistic.”
Hollinger International paid $3 million for the flat in 1994 for Lord Black to use when in New York — about 60 days a year. Lord Black bought it from the company six years later for the same price. Mr Miller said that it was worth $8.5 million.
On Tuesday night, prosecutors showed jurors CCTV footage of Lord Black carrying 13 boxes of documents out of his office on May 20, 2005.
Shahab Mahmood, a security guard, told the court: “I saw Conrad Black giving some boxes to his chauffeur, who loaded the boxes. It was unusual. I never saw Conrad Black carrying boxes.” Monique Delorme, the comptroller of Hollinger Inc, said that she had stopped staff removing the same boxes earlier in the day.
The trial continues
March 21, 2007
The face: Black Narcissus
Jane Wheatley
BARBARA AMIEL
If Barbara Amiel did call a journalist a slut the other day, it must be because she is under strain. She is appearing daily in court at the trial of her husband, Lord Black of Crossharbour, who faces many years in prison if found guilty. He is accused of using company money to fund an extravagant personal lifestyle to which his wife made heroic contributions.
We could indulge in a little list now, and maybe another at the end if we can fit it in: two private jets, a $295,000 (£150,000) holiday in French Polynesia, a $2,463 handbag, exercise equipment at $2,083, opera tickets for $2,785 and a “birthday party for Barbara” at La Grenouille restaurant in New York costing $42,870. “My extravagance knows no bounds,” she famously said.
Conrad Black is Amiel’s fourth husband, but the one she has stuck with. “Both shared a need to be respected, accepted and admired in the spotlight,” wrote Tom Bower in his biography of the couple. Amiel’s apparently insatiable need for possessions and conquest is put down to a shaky start in which her parents separated, her mother uprooted the family to Canada, her father committed suicide and she left home at 14 to lodge in a part-time brothel.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
She worked hard, attended Toronto University and thence to a glittering career in journalism, exceeded only by a parallel career as a kind of latterday courtesan in which she used sex appeal as a form of direct action. “If she sits next to someone at dinner and she decides she wants to please, there’s no one more brilliant than her,” an admirer observed. “She fixes those great green eyes on you and the rest is history. It is an amazing performance.”
After a period as the first female editor of the Toronto Sun , where she was once spotted striding through the office in an open trenchcoat revealing a black bustier, garter belt and fishnet stockings, Amiel moved to England as a columnist for The Times and The Sunday Times purveying her trenchantly pro-Israel, pro-American, Eurosceptic views and her belief that homosexuality was an abomination. She then moved to The Telegraph group, owned by her future husband.
They were married in 1992 and embarked on a lifestyle whose lavishness implied unlimited wealth. But there were those who suspected differently. “Only a few hundred women in the world can afford to dress like Mrs Black, and Mrs Black may not be among them,” a Canadian journalist observed. The couple employed 17 staff in various homes all of whom had to hide in cupboards or behind doors at Amiel’s approach because she hated seeing any of them.
Amiel, 67, has retained her youthful figure and looks with a regime of medicine, drugs and surgery, but fears time’s winged chariot. “He will leave me,” she told a friend once. “I’m making plans for when it all goes wrong.”
Celebrity
Saucy, strange or sad? The 2007 Big Brother contestants
Slide Show
Conrad Black trial hears of ‘$60m thieves wearing ties’
James Bone in Chicago
Conrad Black was compared to a bank robber yesterday as the US Government accused him of a “money-grab” at his newspaper empire.
Jeffrey Cramer, a federal prosecutor, told the jury that Lord Black of Crossharbour and his three codefendants had stolen $60 million (£30 million) from shareholders.
“Bank robbers wear masks and use a gun. Burglars wear dark clothing and use a crowbar. But these four men — lawyers and accountants — dressed in ties and wore a suit,” he said.
At one point, Mr Cramer turned and angrily addressed Lord Black, the former owner of The Daily Telegraph, directly as he sat at the defence table in the centre of the court.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
But the fallen press baron, once self-assured but now ashen-faced, avoided the prosecutor’s gaze and stared ahead at the jury.
Lord Black, 62, faces up to 101 years in jail and $164 million in fines if convicted of 17 counts of fraud, money-laundering, tax evasion, obstruction of justice and racketeering.
He appeared in court in the same gunmetal blue suit he has worn for earlier hearings, escorted by his wife, Barbara Amiel, and his daughter from his first marriage, Alana.
Lady Black, dressed in the same hacking jacket and rust blouse she had worn the day before, offered no apology for her outburst on Monday in which she called a female Canadian television producer a “slut” and denounced journalists as “vermin”.
“It was a private conversation between me and my stepdaughter. I will not confirm or deny those words. They were about certain journalists and they know who they are,” she said. “I am here for more important things. I really am.”
Lord Black’s lawyer said that Lady Black may have been upset by the presence in court of two biographers that her husband had sued for libel.
The prosecution used charts to explain its claim that Lord Black and his fellow accused stole $60 million of shareholders’ money by disguising it as tax-free noncompete agreements during the sale of the company’s newspapers.
“You are sitting in a room with four men who stole $60 million and betrayed the trust of thousands of shareholders — four men who decided among themselves their six or seven-figure salaries were not enough,” Mr Cramer told the jury. Appearing puzzled by the financial details, the jurors sat up when Mr Cramer told them how Lord Black used a corporate jet for a holiday on the Pacific island of Bora Bora at a cost of $500,000.
He projected a slide of Lord Black’s US Customs declaration on returning to Seattle from French Polynesia, on which he had ticked “Personal” when asked the purpose of his trip. The prosecutor introduced an e-mail in which Lord Black, questioned about the jet, said: “I am not prepared to reenact the French Revolutionary renunciation of the rights of nobility . . . We are proprietors after all, beleaguered though we may be.”
Mr Cramer mocked Lord Black’s claim to be a “proprietor” when he was the controlling shareholder of a public company. “A proprietor is an owner. The shareholders own that company. The shareholders own the private jet. The shareholders just picked up $600,000 for his private trip,” he said.
Ed Genson, Lord Black’s lawyer, insisted that his client, the largest single shareholder in the company, was innocent. “He was not stealing from himself,” he said. “His company was stolen from him.”
Mr Genson said that Lord Black divided his empire geographically with his former right-hand-man, David Radler. He blamed Radler, who has struck a plea deal to testify for the prosecution, for the suspect deals. The trial continues.
May 24, 2007
Lord Black’s secret pact with Trump to laud his own virtues
James Bone in New York
Read Conrad Black's e-mail to Donald Trump
Lord Black of Crossharbour secretly enlisted Donald Trump to speak up on his behalf at a heated shareholders meeting as he faced growing criticism of his stewardship of the newspaper empire, his fraud trial was told yesterday.
The former press baron sent a “Dear Donald” e-mail to the property mogul and reality TV star asking for a “rather esoteric favour” before the company’s 2003 annual meeting.
“If you were able to put in a cameo appearance and say a supporting word, I’m sure it would have an impact on the group and be favourably noted in the press,” Lord Black wrote.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Mr Trump, star of The Apprentice reality TV series, had bought the Chicago Sun-Times building from Lord Black’s newspaper group. But he did not qualify to attend the shareholders’ meeting because he did not hold any stock.
Paul Healy, the company’s head of investor relations, testified yesterday that Lord Black told him shortly before the meeting to give Mr Trump a proxy vote so he could attend.
Mr Healy said Lord Black told him that Mr Trump “will be one of those present to support us”. Jurors were played a tape recording of the meeting at which Mr Trump declared: “I fully support the company and its management, and in particular I have great respect for Conrad Black.” He was one of the few people to support the management as other shareholders peppered Lord Black with questions over millions of dollars in payments and perks he had received.
Mr Trump has been named as a potential witness for Lord Black’s defence, which is likely to begin in the first week of June. The property mogul is expected to testify in support of Lord Black’s claim that a $62,000 surprise 60th birthday party he threw for his wife at a New York restaurant with $40,000 in company money was in part a business event.
Before the trial, the New York Times reported that Mr Trump was ready to tell the court that he attended the party because he was negotiating to buy the Chicago Sun-Times building at the time.
Prosecutors have sought to cast doubt on that claim by showing a seating plan of the 80-person dinner and eliciting testimony from Mr Radler, Lord Black’s former right-hand-man, that he did not discuss the sale of the building with Mr Trump at the party. Mr Trump has publicly advised Lord Black, who attended his 2005 wedding, to “hang tough” through his trial.
Mr Trump later razed the Sun-Times building and is building a skyscraper on the site.
During cross-examination, Lord Black’s lawyer suggested that Mr Healy, who is testifying under an immunity deal with prosecutors, had not been supportive of Lord Black. “I supported Conrad until I found out what he’d done,” Mr Healy said.
Prosecutors indicated that they may call company shareholders to testify against Lord Black. Eric Sussman, the lead prosecutor, told the judge that he may call Gene Fox, of Cardinal Capital Management, one of the shareholders.
The trial continues
March 18, 2007
Daughter steals show in Black’s fraud trial
Tony Allen-Mills, New York
Help arrived for Conrad Black last week from an unexpected quarter. All eyes were initially on the former owner of The Daily Telegraph and his wife, Barbara Amiel, as they arrived at a federal courthouse in Chicago to begin his trial on charges of corporate fraud — but it was his daughter, Alana, who stole the show.
Rarely seen with her father in public, the 24-year-old Canadian daughter of Lord Black of Crossharbour turned up in what may prove to be a valuable supporting role as the trial starts in earnest tomorrow after two days of jury selection last week.
With her willowy good looks and public displays of affection for her father, Alana Black caused speculation in media and legal circles that her presence would help to soften her father’s plutocratic image with a Chicago jury that is expected to be largely blue collar.
“She’s confident and charming, but she doesn’t have her father’s swagger,” noted Peter Worthington, a Canadian columnist covering the trial. “It seems like she can’t help but be smiling and friendly.” She may also have a financial stake in the outcome of what is likely to prove a tumultuous trial on prosecution charges that Black looted $83m (£42.7m) from Hollinger International, his former company, to finance a lifestyle of reckless extravagance.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Alana, who was dubbed “Baby Black” by a Canadian magazine, was the middle of three children born to Black and his first wife, Shirley, who later changed her name to Joanna. The couple divorced in 1992.
Despite reports that the now adult children did not get on well with Amiel, there was no sign of friction last week as the family drove away from the courthouse with Alana sitting between her father and stepmother.
Alana was the only one smiling, but her experience of the case so far has scarcely been a happy one. Quite apart from the prospect that her father could go to jail for up to 101 years if he is found guilty of fraud, racketeering, money laundering and obstruction of justice, at least part of her inheritance may be threatened if the US government moves to confiscate Black’s assets.
It emerged during pretrial wrangling last year that Alana and her brothers, Jonathan and James, had a part share of the £18m mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, that Black had offered as security for the $20m bail that has so far kept him out of jail.
Jonathan Black, a 29-year-old model, has lived in California and Japan and has appeared on the pages of Maxim and Italian Vogue magazines. He has not been seen in Chicago; neither has James, 21, who is reportedly studying at Concordia University in Montreal.
Alana worked briefly as an intern on a Canadian magazine once owned by her father, but none of the children is known to have pursued a corporate career.
At one point last June, the US prosecutors threatened to revoke Black’s bail after a row over the value of his Florida property and how much of the proceeds of any sale would be left over for the US government. The Canadian government had already obtained a court order seeking at least $14m in allegedly unpaid taxes which it said should come from the sale of the house.
It also emerged that Black had included his wife and three children in a complex structure that gave all of them part-ownership of the property through his private company, Conrad Black Capital. According to court documents, Amiel had a stake worth £6.57m and the three children between them shared another £6.57m.
Amy St Eve, the Chicago trial judge, eventually accepted the bail arrangements but, according to court papers, Amiel and the three children agreed to possible forfeiture of their holdings as part of Black’s bail conditions.
If Black is found guilty, the US government is expected to seize the house, which is reportedly for sale.
Alana may also help to draw attention from Amiel, whose addiction to luxurious excess is in danger of dominating the trial. The woman who famously once boasted that “I have an extravagance that knows no bounds” was keeping an uncharacteristically low profile, seemingly as part of a defence strategy to avoid any sign of conspicuous consumption that might antagonise the jury.
Amiel, 66, was widely judged last week to have played the part of a demure and loyal wife to perfection, turning up for court in outfits more Mary Magdalene than Marie Antoinette.
Yet the couple’s calm and confident demeanour must conceal private torment. Whatever the Blacks truly feel about Conrad’s chances of staying out of jail, both must be quaking at the prospect that up to 11,000 of their e-mails to each other - many believed to contain explicit sexual references - may be made public by the court.
St Eve has yet to rule on a prosecution request to accept the e-mails as evidence that Black was aware of his wife’s spending habits, which allegedly included handbags, jogging attire, exercise equipment, a leather briefcase and even stereo equipment for their New York flat, all charged to Hollinger accounts.
Black’s lawyers have argued that under US law wives cannot give evidence against their husbands and that the e-mails should be excluded from the trial.
In one respect prosecutors may have misjudged the impact that the e-mails may have. Several Canadian commentators have noted that not many ordinary citizens can identify with the Blacks’ champagne and caviar lifestyle; but a great many married couples write deeply embarrassing things to each other and may sympathise with the Blacks’ attempts to stop their billets doux becoming public.
When Black finally comes before the jury tomorrow, one of his few sources of comfort and solace in the courtroom may prove to be his daughter. He wrote of Alana in his 1993 autobiography: “No little girl could ever give a doting father more pleasure than she has always done.”
HAVE YOUR SAY
What I am trying to figure out is if Alana Black is a Bishop's College School alumni... It says so on the BCS Wiki, yet I find that unreliable.
Michael Forian, Brossard, Canada
One wonders why they trotted the dolly dimples of the family out to seek sympathy of their peers , seems just the thing that desperate parties will try to gain some sympathy of the court. If all goes like most of the other mogals of money it wouldn't be too surprised to see
Gordon Davies, Victoria, Canada B.C.
It's not at all clear in this article how Black's daughter in any way stole the show, as the headline claims. Was it by smiling or was it by being "willowy?" Besides, the show hasn't begun yet.
Uncle Ian, Beautiful Oshawa, Canada
What I am trying to figure out is if Alana Black is a Bishop's College School alumni... It says so on the BCS Wiki, yet I find that unreliable.
Michael Forian, Brossard, Canada
One wonders why they trotted the dolly dimples of the family out to seek sympathy of their peers , seems just the thing that desperate parties will try to gain some sympathy of the court. If all goes like most of the other mogals of money it wouldn't be too surprised to see
Gordon Davies, Victoria, Canada B.C.
It's not at all clear in this article how Black's daughter in any way stole the show, as the headline claims. Was it by smiling or was it by being "willowy?" Besides, the show hasn't begun yet.
Uncle Ian, Beautiful Oshawa, Canada
Lord Black trial
Corrupt media tycoon faces 20 years behind bars

The former Telegraph chairman Conrad Black was convicted of fraud and obstruction of justice after a four-month trial
Black’s conviction and the prospect of a lengthy jail term renews speculation over the future of the Blacks’ marriage
Famed for his extravagance and haughty manner, Black will now have to forgo his exotic lifestyle and prepare for prison
The trial gave a glimpse into the lavish lifestyle of a press baron
The fallen Lord
Lord Black of Crossharbour once controlled a majority of the newspapers in Canada: he now faces a lengthy jail sentence
Timeline of the career of Lord Black of Crossharbour, the tycoon who was once one of the world's biggest newspaper moguls
Tom Bower reveals the childhood traumas behind the excesses of Conrad Black, the former press baron facing a multi-million fraud trial and prison
The Trial
The former press baron routinely billed the company when he travelled on the jet to Florida, a government witness testified
A court hears Lord Black secretly enlisted Donald Trump to speak up on his behalf at a heated shareholders meeting
Lifelong friend of Conrad Black gave evidence directly linking the former press baron to unauthorised payments
Prosecutors introduced an e-mail into evidence to show that the South Pacific trip was not a legitimate company expense
The Black family
The 24-year-old Canadian daughter of Lord Black of Crossharbour turned up in what may prove to be a valuable supporting role
The wife of Lord Black allegedly jeopardised the resale of his New York apartment by stripping it even of the chandeliers
If Barbara Amiel did call a journalist a slut the other day, it must be because she is under strain
From Times Online
July 13, 2007
Profile: Conrad Black, fallen media baron
(Jonathan Becker/The Times)
The Blacks at their home in Palm Beach, Florida, one of the many residences they owned across the world
A billionaire media baron with a taste for a lavish lifestyle, Conrad Moffat Black is no stranger to the spotlight.
The flamboyant larger-than-life character with a ruthless business mind bought his first newspaper more than 30 years ago and went on to run hundreds of titles around the world, including the Daily Telegraph.
With homes in New York, Toronto, Florida and London, the socialite is known to enjoy the company of the rich, powerful and famous, with his glamorous second wife, journalist Barbara Amiel, 66, by his side.
But Lord Black of Crossharbour has seen his empire and power unravel in the space of four years as he faced the racketeering, fraud and obstruction of justice charges.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
He was born in Montreal, Canada, on August 25 1944. His father George was a wealthy brewery executive. Black’s entrepreneurial skills first caused him trouble when he was expelled as a 14-year-old student from Toronto’s elite Upper Canada College after he made 1,400 dollars by selling his classmates’ stolen exams.
He went on to read history at Carleton University, law at Laval and achieved an MA from McGill before he bought his first newspaper, the Eastern Townships Advertiser in Quebec, in 1966.
His media empire began to develop as he bought more small Canadian newspapers before he co-founded the Sterling Newspapers Group in 1971.
Seven years later, he became chair of the Argus Corporation, from which he launched the Hollinger group.
By the 1990s, Hollinger controlled 60 per cent of Canadian newspapers, along with hundreds of dailies in England, the US, Australia and Israel.
At its peak in 1999, Hollinger had revenues of more than two billion dollars and Black was publisher of the third-biggest group of newspapers in the world.
Black’s first marriage was to Joanne (born Shirley) Hishon, of Montreal, by whom he has two sons, Jonathan David Conrad and James Patrick Leonard Black, and a daughter, Alana Whitney Elizabeth Black. The couple divorced in 1992, the same year that Black married Watford-born Barbara Amiel.
He hit the headlines again when the British Government moved to ennoble him and was opposed by Canadian prime minister Jean Chretien, who used the Nickle Resolution of 1919 to rule that foreign governments could not grant honours to Canadians that carry a title of privilege.
After an unsuccessful court challenge, Black renounced his Canadian citizenship and was officially inducted into the House of Lords as Lord Black of Crossharbour on October 31 2001.
Crossharbour lies near to what was then the site of the Daily Telegraph building in the Docklands, one of the crown jewels of the Hollinger International empire.
During these glory days at the turn of the century, Black and his second wife Barbara were known for throwing lavish parties in their Kensington home in London. The couple also owned mansions in Toronto and Palm Beach, Florida, along with an apartment on Park Avenue, Manhattan.
During the trial, a long list of the trappings of wealth that Black used to make this company flat, near New York’s Central Park, habitable emerged.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
These included Napoleon Bonaparte’s shaving stand and a set of marble elephant carvings that cost 17,710 dollars (£8,900), a heated towel rail which cost 4,399 dollars (£2,200), and a 9,800 dollar (<AC163>4,900) set of Louis XVI painted stools with rails carved in a Guilloche pattern.
He also developed a reputation as a merciless businessman with a love of suing anyone who crossed him.
But by 2003, his downfall had begun.
Black lost control of Hollinger International, his newspaper empire that stretched from Canada halfway across the world, when minority shareholders in the US accused him of siphoning off millions of dollars of their money in unauthorised payments to himself.
A special committee of Hollinger’s board found what it called evidence of “excessive” fees paid to Black and other executives, and demanded repayment. Black brushed off the allegations, writing to the company’s investor relations officer: “Two years from now, no one will remember any of this.”
But he was ousted as chief executive in November 2003 and, two months later, also lost his chairmanship as the company sought 200 million dollars (£100 million) in damages in a suit filed against him in Chicago.
Hollinger Inc, the Toronto-based parent company of the publishing company, also filed lawsuits.
Black countersued and then tried to sell Hollinger’s key newspaper titles to the Barclay brothers, but was blocked in court by Hollinger International.
On August 31 2004, the special committee’s damning report, which accused Black of running Hollinger like a “corporate kleptocracy”, was made public by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
The report accused Black and other executives of taking hundreds of millions of dollars that they were not entitled to. Black sued the special committee for defamation.
Then in September 2005, Black’s former associate and long-term friend David Radler pleaded guilty to a single count of mail fraud as part of a scheme to divert more than $32 million dollars (£16 million) from Hollinger International.
Radler agreed to testify for the US government and was given a reduced sentence of 29 months in jail.
Black’s Toronto-based holding company, Ravelston, was also charged and pleaded guilty, despite Black’s objections, to one count of mail fraud.
Criminal charges of racketeering, obstruction of justice and money laundering were laid against Black in December 2005, followed by charges of criminal tax evasion the following year.
Black said he was entitled to the so-called “non-compete” payments which he was given, and described the allegations as “monstrous defamations”. Even some of Black’s critics acknowledge he believes he has done nothing wrong. Meanwhile, Black is also trying to regain his Canadian citizenship.
In an opinion piece headlined “I am not afraid”, which was published before his trial began, Black wrote: “I have never been happier to be Canadian.”
The 62-year-old has also published books on a number of topics, including the 2003 biography Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion Of Freedom, which was described by Publisher’s Weekly as “not only the best one-volume life of the 32nd president but the best at any length, bound to be widely read and discussed”.
Published Saturday, July 14, 2007
Conrad Black, Ex-Press Baron, Guilty of Fraud
RICHARD SIKLOS
Conrad M. Black, the Canadian-born press baron who cut a glittering swath through financial, political and high-society circles in Toronto, London and New York, was found guilty of fraud yesterday in a Chicago courtroom, along with three of his former employees.
Mr. Black, the former head of Hollinger International, faces as many as 35 years in prison, although the exact sentence determined by Judge Amy St. Eve at a sentencing hearing Nov. 30 is likely to be far shorter.
The verdict represents a remarkable turn in fortune for Mr. Black, the son of a wealthy Canadian businessman and society fixture who once commanded a far-flung media empire that included The Daily Telegraph in London, The Jerusalem Post and The Chicago Sun-Times, as well as scores of other papers in the United States, Canada and Australia.
“We’re gratified by the jury’s verdict,” Patrick Fitzgerald, United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, told a news conference.
“We believe the verdict vindicates the serious public interest in making sure that when insiders in a corporation deal with money entrusted to the shareholders, that they’re not engaged in self-dealing, that they not break the law to benefit themselves instead of the shareholders,” he added. Mr. Black, also known as Lord Black of Crossharbour, was found guilty of three counts of mail fraud and a single count of obstruction of justice by the Chicago jury.
He was cleared of nine other counts, largely centered around so-called noncompete agreements in which Mr. Black and others were accused of skimming money from the sale of Hollinger assets under the pretense of being paid not to compete with the new owners.
When the judge read through each of the counts in the verdict, Mr. Black sat stonily but then shot the jury a scathing look. Later, he was consoled by his wife and his daughter, Alana, who had sat in the court to support him throughout the trial.
Mr. Black’s Canadian lawyer, Edward Greenspan, said he intended to appeal, noting that his client was cleared on most of the more serious charges.
“Obviously we’re disappointed — we came here to be acquitted of everything — but we’re not disheartened,” he said. “For the purposes of an appeal, this puts us in a pretty darn good position.”
Mr. Black surrendered his passport yesterday after a bail hearing and was ordered to remain in Chicago until the judge rules on whether to allow him to return to Canada, remain in Chicago or be remanded to custody.
At the bail hearing, the lead prosecutor, Eric Sussman, said he would argue for revoking Mr. Black’s bond, saying he is a flight risk.
During his long, flamboyant career, Mr. Black has alternately charmed and bullied journalists and, along with his wife, the columnist Barbara Amiel, has made social and business connections with powerful, largely politically conservative figures on both sides of the Atlantic.
He populated his board of directors with bold-face names including Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle and Marie-Josée Kravis, and gave black-tie dinners that included Richard M. Nixon, Mr. Kissinger, Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher as guest speakers.
Mr. Black’s trial drew a large contingent of journalists from his native Canada and Britain, and became something of a curiosity in Chicago, a city he had rarely spent time in before his criminal trial but where Hollinger International was based. The company is now called the Sun-Times Media Group.
Charges of various counts of mail and tax fraud were also filed against Hollinger’s former chief financial officer, John A. Boultbee; a former vice president, Peter Y. Atkinson; and a former Hollinger lawyer, Mark S. Kipnis. The three were all found guilty on the same three counts of mail fraud that Mr. Black was — none of them stemming from the more attention-grabbing charges of fraud or the accusations that Mr. Black improperly charged lavish perks to the company.
In the end, Mr. Black and his three colleagues were found guilty of taking illegal payments from the company in two schemes adding up to $6.1 million — a relative trifle in the world of billionaires once inhabited by Mr. Black where, at its peak, his own net worth was estimated at more than $400 million.
Mr. Black and the others, along with F. David Radler, a former business partner, were charged in 2005 with looting Hollinger International of more than $80 million. When the trial began on March 27, the amount was reduced to $60 million, which, Mr. Fitzgerald maintained, was the property of the company.
One of the two schemes that led to convictions involved a subsidiary of Hollinger International paying the defendants for agreeing that they would not compete with that subsidiary, American Publishing Company, for three years if they were to leave the company. At that time, however, American Publishing’s sole asset was a small paper in Mammoth County, Calif., that it was in the process of selling.
“When he paid a noncompete to himself, not to compete with himself — chutzpah comes to mind,” said Herbert A. Denton, a shareholder activist who was involved in Mr. Black’s ouster and is now on the board of Sun-Times Media.
Prosecutors had further charged that the agreements were backdated so that under Canadian laws at the time, they would be tax-free. Lawyers for Mr. Black argued at the trial that these payments were management fees owed him and that no crime was committed.
The second count on which Mr. Black and the others were found guilty involved the sale of small-town newspapers in the fall of 2000 resulting in $600,000 being paid as non-compete agreements. The obstruction of justice charge related to Mr. Black’s removing boxes from his Toronto office ahead of the trial, a sight caught on the office’s security cameras and shown to jurors.
Mr. Black’s downfall began in 2002 when unhappy shareholders began questioning these and other payments made to him, other executives and holding companies he controlled.
After Mr. Black and Mr. Radler were ousted as chief executive and president of Hollinger International in November 2003, Mr. Black asserted that he was a victim of corporate governance “terrorists” who were trying to steal his company.
Mr. Radler at first took a similar stance, but went on to plead guilty to a single fraud count and testify against Mr. Black and the others at the trial in return for the promise of a lenient sentence.
Before and during the trial, Mr. Black adamantly declared his innocence outside the courtroom, sometimes commenting in French and once calling the prosecutors “Nazis.”
Most of Mr. Black’s wealth has been confiscated as part of his ouster from his company. In addition to fines with his prison sentence, he still faces more than $1 billion in civil litigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission and others, and is now on the hook for tens of millions of dollars in legal fees.
At various points, Mr. Black’s lawyers had argued that their client would not get a fair trial because he is a wealthy man and the jury members — nine women and three men — were presumably not.
“The irony is that a ‘jury of his peers’ brought Conrad Black down,” Mr. Denton said. “I’m sure he doesn’t consider those people his peers.”
| Former Cayman Free Press shareholder Conrad Black convicted of fraud |
| Published on Saturday, July 14, 2007 |
| |
| |
|
CHICAGO, USA (Bloomberg): Conrad Black, former chief executive officer of Hollinger International Inc., a media empire that reportedly owned a 40 percent interest in Cayman Free Press, was found guilty of defrauding the newspaper publisher, becoming the latest CEO convicted in a five-year US crackdown on corporate crime.
 |
Deposed media tycoon Conrad Black leaves the Federal Courthouse in Chicago after being found guilty of raiding his company's coffers and bilking shareholders of some 60 million US dollars from the sale of hundreds of newspapers in Canada and the United States.
AFP PHOTO |
Black, 62, was convicted on Friday in Chicago of three fraud charges and obstruction of justice. He was acquitted on nine charges. Three codefendants were convicted of the same three fraud charges as Black. |
The former executive was accused of stealing $60 million from Hollinger, once the world's third-largest publisher of English-language newspapers. Prosecutors said the money was disguised as fees he and two codefendants got for not competing with buyers of about $3 billion of newspapers Hollinger sold.
According to earlier reports, the committee investigating alleged financial wrongdoing by Black had been unable to account for dividend payments from Cayman Free Press of some $1.5 million.
“The government overcame a very shaky start to win this case,” said Jacob Frenkel, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice in Rockville, Maryland. “They were able to pull a rabbit out of the hat.”
A federal court jury of nine women and three men returned the verdicts after a 15-week trial and 12 days of deliberations. Jurors resumed their work July 10 on orders of US District Judge Amy St Eve after saying they couldn't unanimously agree on all the charges against the four.
Convicted with Black were former Hollinger Vice President Peter Atkinson, 60, ex-Chief Financial Officer John Boultbee, 64, and ex-General Counsel Mark Kipnis, 59. Atkinson and Boultbee were accused of stealing through the non-compete agreements. Kipnis was accused of helping the others steal.
Black faces 20 years in prison on the most serious conviction, for obstruction of justice. The three fraud charges carry a maximum penalty of five years each.
Black has been free on $21 million bail. Lead prosecutor Eric Sussman asked St Eve after the verdicts to revoke the former CEO's bond, saying he faces at least 15 to 20 years in prison.
“He has had his day in court,” Sussman said. “Will he show up for sentencing?”
A lawyer for Black argued the bail should continue.
“We have a very visible man who is followed around by reporters wherever he goes,” defense attorney Edward Genson said. “He has no incentive to flee.”
St Eve said she will decide on Black's bail later. She allowed Atkinson and Boultbee, who Sussman said face seven to 10 years in prison, to remain free.
Before the verdict was read, Black began breathing deeply, his shoulders moving up and down. He didn't visibly react on hearing the first guilty verdict and leafed through his verdict form as the other decisions were being read.
“He's doing okay,” Black's lawyer Edward Greenspan said later of his client.
Since Enron Corp. collapsed in 2001, prosecutors convicted every chief executive officer tried for accounting fraud or other major corporate crime. Black was the last targeted CEO to be tried.
Those convicted include former CEOs Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, 53, of Enron; Bernard Ebbers, 65, of WorldCom; L. Dennis Kozlowski, 60, of Tyco International; Joseph Nacchio, 58, of Qwest Communications; Richard Scrushy, 54, of HealthSouth; and John Rigas, 82, of Adelphia Communications.
Lay's conviction was voided last year because he died at age 64 before he could complete his appeals.
Scrushy, who led the largest US operator of rehabilitation hospitals, was acquitted of accounting-fraud charges, then convicted of bribing the governor of Alabama to gain a seat on a state hospital board.
Prosecutors told jurors in closing arguments that Black and his codefendants “systematically stole” the millions, leaving a “phony paper trail.” No defendant took the witness stand.
Defence lawyers said the non-compete agreements were required conditions of selling the newspapers. Black's lawyer asked jurors not to convict him just because he's rich.
Black was forced to resign as Hollinger's CEO in November 2003 after an internal investigation concluded he and the other executives paid themselves $15.6 million without board approval. Two months later, the board fired Black as chairman and sued him for $200 million. The four men were indicted in 2005.
A board-commissioned report by former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Richard Breeden claimed in August 2004 that Black and other insiders diverted $400 million, 95 percent of Hollinger's adjusted net income from 1997 to 2003, from the company. Black's libel suit against Breeden is pending.
The chief government witness at the trial was former Hollinger President David Radler. He pleaded guilty to a single fraud count stemming from the non-compete-fee scheme.
Radler told jurors that Black oversaw the diversion of Hollinger money to its parent, the Toronto-based holding company Hollinger Inc., which Black controlled.
Black was found not guilty of cheating shareholders by spending company money for personal expenses, including $500,000 to use a company jet to fly to the Pacific island of Bora Bora for a vacation, billing Hollinger for two-thirds of a $62,000 birthday party for his wife, Barbara Amiel Black, and for the renovation of their Park Avenue home.
Hollinger, at its peak, trailed only News Corp. and Gannett Co. in publishing English-language newspapers, including the Chicago Sun-Times, the U.K.'s Daily Telegraph, Canada's National Post, the Jerusalem Post and hundreds of community newspapers. The company is now called Sun-Times Media Group Inc.
Black, 6-foot-1, silver-haired and barrel-chested, was raised in Toronto's wealthy Bridle Path neighborhood and owned homes in Toronto, London, New York and Palm Beach. He wielded power as a wealthy media owner and member of Britain's House of Lords as Lord Black of Crossharbour. He renounced his Canadian citizenship to become a British peer.
Black has a master's degree in history from Montreal's McGill University and a law degree from Laval University in Quebec. He wrote well-reviewed biographies of former US presidents Richard Nixon and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
EDITORIAL
TheStar.com - comment - The downfall of Conrad BlackJul 14, 2007
His legendary smugness shattered by a jury of 12 ordinary Americans, Conrad Black gave them a venomous stare as their findings of guilt on four of the 13 counts against him were read to the court. Convicted on three counts of mail fraud and the more serious charge of obstruction of justice, Black faces a maximum of 35 years in prison, $1 million in penalties, and the forfeiture of millions of dollars in assets. Barring successful appeals on the charges, Black is going to jail.
His co-defendants – Jack Boultbee, Peter Atkinson and Mark Kipnis – were also found guilty of complicity in taking so-called noncompete payments from shareholders to whom the money belonged.
While the case now moves on to forfeiture hearings to determine how much Black and the others will be required to pay back to those they defrauded, to sentencing and possible appeals, business journalists, academics and corporate lawyers will no doubt have a lot to say about the case. Early commentary suggests that Americans and Canadians will bring far different perspectives to the convictions.
For Americans, it is just the latest attempt by the state to restore investor confidence in the stock markets that underpin the U.S. economy after the beating they took in the wake of the scandals at Enron, WorldCom and Tyco.
As one U.S. observer put it, "We've gone through a period where there was not a great deal of government enforcement in white-collar cases. And recently we've seen a great deal more concern by the Department of Justice about white-collar and corporate fraud cases."
For Canadians, however, Black's conviction represents the latest, if not the last, chapter in a saga of a larger-than-life figure who held the country of his birth in contempt. Some will keep searching for reasons why someone who was so rich and powerful would feel the need to pilfer money from minority shareholders in the company he ran. Others will wonder why he even took the chance. On both scores, many will likely blame moral vacuity and plain old greed for Black's descent from international newspaper baron to white-collar criminal.
But underlying almost any explanation for Black's crossing of the criminal line is the tragic character flaw that has been reflected in so much of what he said and did. Black showed an enormous propensity for hubris, the same trait that doomed Macbeth. The biblical proverb "pride goeth before a fall" suggests Black's fate was likewise sealed.
Black's arrogance was reflected in his sesquipedalian language, the contempt in which he held so many people, his lavish lifestyle, and the willing surrender of his Canadian citizenship for a British title. But his downfall ultimately came from his misguided belief that he was entitled to the payments for not competing with newspapers Hollinger International sold off because he saw the widely held public company as nothing more than an extension of himself.
While Black's hubris prevented him from seeing the character trait in himself, ironically, he readily saw it in others, as when he said that he "always felt it was the compulsive element in Napoleon that drew him into greater and greater undertakings, until he was bound to fail."
His own hubris was certainly evident in a 2002 email on the use of corporate aircraft, in which he said, "I'm not prepared to re-enact the French Revolutionary renunciation of the rights of the nobility."
The jury, however, decided that Lord Black's sense of his own nobility did not give him the right to confiscate money from commoners who invested with him.
A Chicago jury has found Conrad Black guilty on three counts of mail fraud and one count of obstruction of justice. The world-renowned media magnate and author is now liable to spend up to 35 years in prison.
To many of his longstanding critics in the media and elsewhere, Friday's verdict will be taken as proof that the man is a quintessential symbol of corporate criminality. Such a simplistic conclusion would do a disservice to an accomplished businessman and intellectual.
Since the fall of Enron in late 2001, the corporate kleptocrat has gained prominence as a stock villain in our popular culture. Billion-dollar corporate scandals have become so numbingly numerous - Tyco, WorldCom, Healthsouth, Qwest, Computer Associates and Adelphia being only the most prominent - that convicted corporate executives now are routinely lumped together as if their misdeeds were identical. But of course, they are not.
While Lord Black has been found guilty of four crimes, he does not deserve to be spoken of in the same breath as, say, WorldCom's Bernie Ebbers, Enron's Andrew Fastow, Jeffrey Skilling and Ken Lay, and Adelphia's John Rigas. These are criminal conspirators who created fraudulent billion-dollar empires, and who impoverished thousands of their ordinary unsuspecting shareholders and employees when the fraud was uncovered. Lord Black did no such thing. Whatever the findings relating to the mail-fraud and obstruction-of-justice charges against him, he did not build imaginary corporate castles in the sky. As many others have noted, he ran a company that was sound and profitable: The corporate do-gooders who came after the man spent far more of the company's money pursuing him than he was ever accused of misappropriating.
All this said, Lord Black has had his day in court. And barring successful appeal, he will be made to pay the price for his crimes. But whatever the man's current travails, it is important that Canadians put his lasting legacy in context. Lord Black delivered to this country a stronger, more vibrant and diverse media market - the National Post being a case a point. With his conviction, the man's critics will have their day. But they should not be permitted to define his place in this country's history.
Media tycoon Conrad Black convicted
Associated Press
Jul. 13, 2007 09:34 AM
CHICAGO - A federal jury convicted fallen media tycoon Conrad Black and three of his former executives at Hollinger International Inc. Friday of illegally pocketing money that should have gone to stockholders.
Black, 62, was convicted of three counts of mail fraud and one count of obstruction of justice. He faces a maximum of 35 years in prison for the offenses, plus a maximum penalty of $1 million.
He was acquitted of nine other counts, including racketeering and misuse of corporate perks, such as taking the company plane on a vacation to Bora Bora and billing shareholders $40,000 for his wife's birthday party.
Black, sitting at a table with his attorneys, did not show any emotion when the verdict was read. After U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve briefly adjourned the court, his wife, Barbara Amiel Black, and his daughter, Alana, leaned over to console him.
While the verdict was mixed, the conviction signaled an increasing trend of aggressive U.S. government pursuit of senior corporate executives, following the Enron, Tyco and WorldCom scandals, and to hold top executives personally accountable for their companies' actions.
Black's three co-defendants were all found guilty of three counts of mail fraud. They are former Hollinger International vice presidents John Boultbee, 64, of Vancouver and Peter Y. Atkinson, 60, of Toronto and attorney Mark Kipnis, 59, of Chicago. They face up to 15 years in prison and fines of up to $750,000.
Hollinger International once owned community papers across the United States and Canada as well as the Chicago Sun-Times, the Toronto-based National Post, The Daily Telegraph of London and Israel's Jerusalem Post. The Sun-Times is the only large paper remaining at the company whose name has been changed to Sun-Times News Group.
The heart of the case against the husky, silver-haired publishing millionaire focused on a large-scale selloff starting in 1998 of Hollinger community papers that were published across the United States and Canada.
Companies that bought newspapers in seven such deals paid millions of dollars to Hollinger International, with headquarters in Chicago, in return for promises it would not go into competition with the new owners.
Black was charged with illegally diverting millions of dollars in those so-called non-compete payments to himself, Boultbee, Atkinson and the longtime No. 2 man in the Hollinger International empire, F. David Radler.
Black was convicted on three counts of those allegations made by prosecutors. The obstruction of justice charge was considered the most likely of all to net a conviction because Black was captured on videotape removing 13 boxes of documents from his Toronto offices, despite a court ban on taking away potential evidence.
Some of the non-compete payments also went to a smaller Toronto corporation, Hollinger Inc., which was controlled by Black and in turn owned a controlling interest in the Chicago-based Hollinger International.
Radler pleaded guilty to fraud and agreed to testify in exchange for a lenient 29-month sentence. In eight days on the witness stand, he contradicted Black's argument that he knew little about the deals that led to the non-compete payments because he was busy with other matters.
Black's attorneys painted Radler as a liar looking for a good deal from prosecutors in his own case.
 
Conrad Black May Be Sorry He Gave Up Cdn. Citizenship
Friday July 13, 2007
CityNews.ca Staff
What happens now to Conrad Black? That appears to the million dollar - or more - question. Black was found guilty of four charges in a Chicago courtroom Friday, and all of them were serious enough to warrant the pending loss of both his freedom and a big chunk of his money. He'll learn his fate on November 30th.
What would it be like for a man of his wealth and stature to wind up going from luxury to the starkness of a prison cell? Friends say that prospect is "devastating", while others predict it's Black's legacy in business history that seems to upset the former British Lord even more. "It's not the crime, it's the demolishing of Conrad's life's work," agrees his friend and columnist Mark Steyn. "It's the knowledge that the first draft of history is going to be written by all your enemies, by all these kinds of jackals from Fleet Street who skipped the last four months but flew in here for the walk to the scaffold."
Those who have followed Black's career believe he will be defiant to the end, stubbornly assuring he did nothing wrong. "His vision of himself is that he is a romantic rebel" much like former U.S. presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Richard Nixon, Napoleon, Winston Churchill and the other historical figures he admires, suggests biographer George Tombs. "If things go badly it's other people's fault."
That includes his closest associate, David Radler, who Black believed would never betray him. "No matter what happens, people aren't allowed to turn on him," Tombs adds. "He tends to see himself as a master strategist and he's moving the pieces on the chess board."
Black has been forced to surrender his passport and will remain in Chicago until his sentencing. He may well rue the day he gave up his Canadian citizenship. "He can reapply," suggests lawyer Lorne Honickman, the host of "Legal Briefs" on CP24. "And my guess is he will reapply immediately ... If he was a Canadian citizen, as is David Radler, we have an agreement with the United States, a prisoner exchange program where you can make the application to serve your sentence In Canada. That happens on a daily basis. Now, not necessarily a slam-dunk but you can't do it if you are not a Canadian citizen."
Black renounced his citizenship in order to take a seat in the British House of Lords, a move that raised eyebrows in his home and native land.
- His legal woes are far from over, however, as he will have to face off against regulatory commissions, both American and Canadian, as well as a number of lawsuits. Waiting in the wings are Black's former companies, Hollinger Inc., Hollinger International and many bitter investors forming class-action suits.
Voices: Conrad Black guilty verdict
Jul 13, 2007 01:07 PM
We asked you what you think of the Conrad Black verdict. Here's what you had to say.
The rich and powerful need to know that they are not immune from punishment for committing crimes. A classic case of greed.
Henrietta Penny, Mississauga
What a farce and waste of time and resources. Why does the justice system not apply these valuable resources against real criminals, such as child molesters? They now mostly get probation against a prospective 35 years for Conrad Black for mostly contrived charges, even though the investors ended up much better off with him in control.
Allan Taylor, Oakville
We are losing a truly great Canadian icon. I hope that his appeal will not bankrupt him and that justice for Conrad Black prevails. My prayers and thoughts are with the honourable Lord Black and his family.
Michael Weir, Toronto
I think white collar crime is just the same as any other, except that it has the benefit of being less personal. If the jury of his peers decided, that’s the way it goes. Money shouldn't make you above the law.
Chris Van Abbema, Pickering
A fair verdict. One cannot commit fraud, etc. and expect to get off lightly, or at all.
Sean Beckett, Toronto
I don't know if John Chrétien is a spiteful man but I just have to think he is smiling knowing Conrad surrendered his Canadian citizenship.
Tom Macmillan, Brockville Ont.
Kudos to the American legal system and the jury. I am happy to see that even the best lawyers don't provide an automatic ‘get out of jail free’ card. I hope I live long enough to see Lord Black do one day in jail, after all the appeals.
Mike Wedmann, Etobicoke
I think that was the main problem for this trial was the fact that there were no victims presented, so in the minds of the jury it was a victimless crime, unlike Enron.
James McKilliop, London, Ont.
Black's surreptitious entry and unlawful removal of files from his office was the lightening rod for me. Yes, a very fair verdict indeed.
Barry Ruhl, Southampton, Ont.
Anyone who holds a position of trust, especially someone who has a high profile such as Mr. Black, must respect the responsibility that he has to his shareholders and to the public at large as to how someone with power and authority must conduct oneself. I only hope that this will prove to a humbling experience for him and that he will walk away a better person for it.
Susan Cain, Brampton
Conrad Black guilty of fraud
Former media tycoon to appeal verdict finding him guilty of three counts of fraud, one count of obstruction of justice.
By Katy Byron and Zak Sos, CNN
July 13 2007: 5:55 PM EDT
CHICAGO (CNN) -- Former media tycoon Conrad Black, who was found guilty on Friday of mail fraud and obstruction of justice for his role in defrauding shareholders of Hollinger International and skimming $60 million from the newspaper conglomerate, will appeal the jury's verdict, Black's attorney Edward Greenspan said upon leaving the courthouse.
Black could face 15-1/2 to 20 years in prison, if the judge accepts the prosecutor's recommendation
"We intend to appeal," said Greenspan. "We vehemently disagree with the government's position on sentencing. We believe based on the conviction of the charges here that the sentences for this type of offense are far less than what the government suggested."
At a later press conference, Patrick Fitzgerald, the lead U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case, suggested that 15-1/2 to 20 years could represent a "conservative estimate of the guidelines range," but added that a judge "will decide what the sentence is based on all the appropriate factors." Black could also pay up to $1 million in fines.
His associates Peter Atkinson, 60, of Oakville, Ontario, Jack Boultbee, 64, of Victoria, British Columbia, and Mark Kipnis, 59, of Northbrook, Illinois, were also found guilty on mail fraud charges. Each could serve up to 15 years in jail.
The court ruled that Boultbee and Atkinson will be allowed to return to Canada to serve their prison sentences.
After the verdict was announced, Fitzgerald described his reaction to the decision as "gratified."
"We think the verdict vindicates the serious public interest in making sure that when insiders in a corporation deal with money entrusted to them by the shareholders that they not break the law to benefit themselves instead of the shareholders," he said.
"The government wins, Black loses. End of story," said CNN Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin.
On the 12th day of deliberations, the Chicago jury acquitted Black, 62, of Toronto, Ontario, of wire fraud, tax fraud and racketeering charges.
The guilty verdicts - on three counts of mail fraud and one count of obstructing justice - put Black's vast personal fortune at risk.
After appearing calm and collected entering the court, Black did not show any visible, emotional reaction once the verdicts were read.
Black has been restricted to the Chicago area and his passport has been handed over to the police until a sentencing hearing set for November 30 at 9 a.m. ET.
"Conrad Black will complete a remarkable fall from grace. He will certainly be sentenced to prison, perhaps for a considerable period of time," said Toobin.
Black did not testify in the trial.
Because he is British, he could serve his time in the United States or be transferred to a British prison.
The case was heard in the U.S. Illinois Northern District court.
During the trial, which began in March, U.S. federal prosecutors described the lavish, eccentric lifestyles of Lord Black and his wife, Lady Barbara Amiel, a journalist.
The case centered on an alleged corporate victim. Unlike the Enron case, this one resulted in no major loss of jobs, worker suffering or company collapse.
Nearly all the prosecution witnesses were granted immunity or allowed to plea bargain.
Black is "sort of [a] bad-boy celebrity," said George Tombs, who is writing his second biography about Black, to be published this fall. "This is somebody who's had tremendous power and he's lost it."
Legal troubles for Hollinger International and Black began in mid-2004, when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission published a report alleging "racketeering" and "corporate kleptocracy," which led to a $1.25 billion racketeering suit against Hollinger and Black.
That fall, after a U.S. federal judge threw out the racketeering suit, Black resigned as chairman and chief executive officer of Hollinger.
Months later, the SEC filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Black, Hollinger's former deputy chairman and chief operating officer, David Radler, and Hollinger.
"Black, Radler and other top executives didn't understand that investors had handed over their money in order to make more money, not to gain entree to a 'private gentleman's club,'" said Tombs, who added that the defendants "continued operating like they did in the '50s from the old Toronto days, wining, dining and schmoozing."
Federal prosecutors, under the guidance of Fitzgerald, said Black and the other three defendants defrauded shareholders of Hollinger International by collecting "non-compete" payments from the sales of media holdings.
In a non-compete, the seller agrees - in exchange for a payment - not to compete in the buyer's market. The prosecution argued that the payments ended up in the pockets of the defendants, as tax-free bonuses, instead of in the company coffers.
"Why were these men getting paid for non-competes that the buyer never requested?" asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Sussman in his closing statement. "Why were they entitled to take this money and lie about it?"
The defense lawyers said shareholders and company directors had approved the payments.
The prosecution had originally hoped Radler would be their star witness. In exchange for a reduced jail sentence, Radler pleaded guilty in 2005 to fraud and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.
But near the end of 25 hours of closing arguments, the prosecution changed course and instead labeled him as a "criminal" and "fraudster."
"You do not need to believe a single word David Radler told you to convict each and every one of these defendants," Sussman told the jury.
Tombs described Black as a modern-day Citizen Kane, a man who "had it all and lost it all."
In the early 1990s, Hollinger controlled 60 percent of Canadian newspapers in addition to hundreds of dailies worldwide, including the Chicago Sun-Times, the Montreal Gazette, Britain's Daily Telegraph and the Jerusalem Post.
Tombs said Black reveled in the pageantry of power. In 1999, the British government moved to make him a life peer of the British House of Lords, but Canada does not allow its citizens to carry the title. Black overcame that obstacle in 2001, when he renounced his Canadian citizenship and became Lord Black of Crossharbour, named for the London subway stop near The Daily Telegraph.
-- CNN's Maria Dugandzic and Nick McGurk contributed to this report
Conrad Black convicted of fraud
Press Association
Friday July 13, 2007 6:13 PM
Fallen media mogul Conrad Black is facing jail after being convicted of fraud and obstruction of justice.
Lord Black of Crossharbour was found guilty of three counts of fraud and one of obstruction by a jury at the Dirksen Federal Courthouse in Chicago, Illinois.
Black was accused with other Hollinger International executives of stealing 60 million dollars (£30 million) from the company's shareholders. Prosecutors alleged that that they behaved like bank robbers secretly swindling the shareholders out of their money.
After the verdicts were delivered to a packed courtroom, prosecutor Eric Sussman called for him to be jailed, declaring that "very conservatively" Black was looking at a sentence of 15 to 20 years.
The jury heard details of Lord Black's lavish lifestyle, which the prosecution claimed was partly funded through fraud.
The panel finally delivered verdicts on the 62-year-old former Daily Telegraph owner and once-powerful chief executive of the Hollinger newspaper empire on the 12th day of deliberations. Black, who launched an immediate appeal, was convicted of three counts of fraud but cleared of a further six. The nine women and three men on the jury also cleared him of charges of racketeering and tax evasion.
The jury had to consider 42 counts against Black and his three co-defendants in a highly complex trial. They had heard the prosecution allege that the 60 million dollars mainly came from the sale of hundreds of Hollinger-owned US and Canadian regional newspapers between 1998 and 2001, in which the buyers paid large sums in return for agreements that Hollinger would not compete with the new owners.
Black, of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, faced nine counts of mail and wire fraud, two counts of tax evasion and one count each of racketeering and obstruction of justice. The billionaire was accused, amongst other things, of cheating Hollinger International by taking the company plane on a holiday to Bora Bora in French Polynesia and billing shareholders 40,000 dollars (£20,000) for his wife's surprise birthday party. He was cleared of the charges relating to these allegations.
Black was convicted of mail fraud - fraud involving the postal service - but cleared of wire fraud - fraud involving any form electronic communication. He could face a maximum sentence of five years for each fraud count and 20 years for obstruction of justice, as well as a huge fine.
Black's three co-defendants were all found guilty of three counts of mail fraud. They are former Hollinger International vice presidents John Boultbee, 64, of Vancouver, and Peter Atkinson, 60, of Toronto, and attorney Mark Kipnis, 59, of Chicago.
Jury finds Black guilty of criminal fraud
Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:06AM BST
By Andrew Stern
CHICAGO (Reuters) - A U.S. jury on Friday found Conrad Black guilty of criminal fraud and obstruction of justice in a grim Friday the 13th verdict that could send the former media baron to jail for up to 35 years.
Black was allowed to remain free on a $21 million (10.3 million pounds) bond pending a July 19 hearing on whether bond should be continued. His lawyers said he would appeal, and sentencing was set for November 30. Black surrendered his passport in court.
He left the courthouse without comment but his lawyer, Edward Greenspan, read a brief statement saying Black had been acquitted of the "central charges" in the case and there were "viable legal issues" on which to appeal.
Black and his three co-defendants were each convicted of three charges of mail fraud. Each fraud charge carried a potential five-year prison sentence. In addition, Black's obstruction conviction carried a possible 20-year sentence. Overall, Black was guilty in four of 13 charges against him.
Eric Sussman, the chief federal prosecutor, indicated the government would ask for at least 15 to 20 years' jail time.
Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney in Chicago, said, "We are very satisfied with the jury's verdict ... it sends a message that anyone who breaks the law and violates the trust of the shareholders with their funds will be punished."
The 62-year-old, Canadian-born member of Britain's House of Lords -- who once derided the case against him as a "massive smear job" and "toilet seat" hanging around prosecutors' necks -- also faces millions of dollars in fines and forfeitures.
The jury acquitted Black of a racketeering charge and all four defendants were also found not guilty of failing to file corporate tax returns.
Black's three co-defendants, former Hollinger International Inc. chief financial officer Jack Boultbee, 64; Peter Atkinson, 60, former vice president and general counsel for the same company; and Mark Kipnis, 59, a former Hollinger lawyer, were all found guilty of the same mail fraud charges as Black.
The charges related to $3.5 million in payments from two separate deals involving the sale of media properties.
Black sat largely expressionless as the verdicts were read but a scowl crept across his face when he was found guilty of obstructing justice -- a charge that related to his removing cartons of records from his Toronto office.
Black's 25-year-old daughter, Alana, and columnist-wife Barbara Amiel Black leaned over to talk to him as he sat at the defence table.
"I would think he is in total shock. He really did believe he was innocent," Canadian author Peter Newman, who wrote a 1982 Black biography, told Reuters.
The flamboyant Black gave up his Canadian citizenship to accept his peerage but is now trying to get it back. He numbered Henry Kissinger, Donald Trump and other powerful figures among his confidants and lived a lifestyle that included travelling on his corporate jet for a holiday in Bora Bora and a lavish birthday party for his wife at a New York restaurant.
Judge Amy St. Eve of U.S. District Court, who presided over the trial, will decide amounts for fines and forfeitures, which could include Black's Palm Beach, Florida, estate and assorted other luxury items such as a $2.6 million diamond ring.
15 WEEKS OF TESTIMONY
Black and the others had been accused by U.S. prosecutors of pilfering $60 million in payments that should have benefited Hollinger International, once the world's third-largest English language newspaper chain, and its shareholders.
At one time, Hollinger's major newspaper holdings included such prominent names as the Daily Telegraph of London, the Jerusalem Post and Canada's National Post.
The verdict came after nearly 15 weeks of testimony in federal court. The prosecution was led by the office of Fitzgerald, who also prosecuted former White House aide Scooter Libby.
The jury of nine women and three men had considered the complex, 42-charge case for 12 days since it was handed to them on June 27.
In a trial that featured about 50 witnesses, prosecutors painted Black and his associates as no better than common thieves.
The defense said the men, who pleaded not guilty and did not take the stand in their own defense, were victims of overzealous prosecutors who failed to produce either a "smoking gun" or victims.
The government's star witness was long-time Black partner David Radler, who pleaded guilty to one count of fraud in an agreement that required him to testify against the four men in exchange for up to 29 months in jail.
The prosecution tried to show that Black and the others were just as guilty as Radler and, like him, lied about what they did. The defense depicted Radler as a serial liar.
Black was ousted as chairman of Hollinger International in 2003 after shareholders questioned the non-compete payment deals. An internal investigation in 2004 concluded that he and other executives oversaw a "corporate kleptocracy."
Hollinger International is now called the Sun-Times Media Group
Late on Friday, Sun-Times Media Group said it would pursue its civil lawsuit against its controlling shareholders and what it called certain former officers and directors.
The company said in a statement that a Special Committee was continuing to pursue Sun-Times Media's claims in U.S. District Court and had already recovered about $185 million from judgments against and settlements with former officers and directors and outside counsel.
(Additional reporting by James Kelleher and David Bailey in Chicago and Amran Abocar in Toronto)
FACTBOX-Key facts about Conrad Black
  

Conrad Black arrives with his wife Barbara Amiel Black at the Dirksen Federal courthouse for a verdict in his trial in Chicago, July 13, 2007. A U.S. jury on Friday found former media mogul Black guilty of multiple counts of criminal fraud and a single count of obstruction of justice but acquitted him of racketeering and tax charges. REUTERS/Stephen J. Carrera
Conrad Black arrives with his wife Barbara Amiel Black at the Dirksen Federal courthouse for a verdict in his trial in Chicago, July 13, 2007. Former media mogul Black is guilty of criminal fraud and obstruction of justice but innocent of racketeering, a U.S. jury found on Friday. REUTERS/Stephen J. Carrera
Conrad Black arrives at the Dirksen Federal courthouse in Chicago, July 13, 2007. Former media mogul Black is guilty of criminal fraud and obstruction of justice but innocent of racketeering, a U.S. jury found on Friday. REUTERS/John Gress
Conrad Black arrives with his wife Barbara Amiel Black at the Dirksen Federal courthouse for a verdict in his trial in Chicago, July 13, 2007. A U.S. jury on Friday found former media mogul Black guilty of multiple counts of criminal fraud and a single count of obstruction of justice but acquitted him of racketeering and tax charges. REUTERS/Stephen J. Carrera
Media tycoon Conrad Black guilty of mail fraud
Heather Rainone July 13, 2007 CHICAGO - A jury finds fallen media tycoon Conrad Black guilty of mail fraud, one of 13 counts he faced for allegedly swindling shareholders out of millions of dollars.
Fraud trial over but civil challenges remain for Conrad Blackat 13:19 on July 13, 2007, EST. TORONTO (CP) - Conrad Black, the former media mogul also known as Lord Black of Crossharbour, is facing an avalanche of lawsuits and aggressive securities regulators now that his criminal trial has ended in a guilty conviction. The Ontario Securities Commission and its American counterpart, the Securities and Exchange Commission, are both champing at their regulatory bits to start proceedings against Black, who was convicted Friday of four criminal charges by a Chicago jury. The 62-year-old Black now faces court claims by companies he formerly controlled, including Hollinger Inc. (TSX:HLG.C) and Hollinger International, now renamed Sun-Times Media Group. Ousted from Hollinger International by a shareholder revolt in late 2003, Black resigned from Hollinger Inc. in November 2004. And waiting in the wings are class-action suits seeking damages of hundreds of millions of dollars filed by retail and institutional investors embittered by stock market losses racked up by his former companies after shareholder complaints of accounting irregularities. Black has also launched lawsuits against his former company. An Ontario Securities Commission hearing against Black has been scheduled to begin in Toronto on Nov. 12, said OSC spokeswoman Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington. The OSC alleges Black and three other former executives engaged in a string of securities law violations, including "egregious conduct" and "conduct contrary to the public interest." The securities regulator alleges Black and his former business associates David Radler, Jack Boultbee and Peter Atkinson made misleading statements in regulatory filings. Black and the others have agreed not to serve as officers and directors of an Ontario issuer until the commission has dealt with the case. Meanwhile, the SEC has said it is poised to move ahead as soon as a judicial order that stayed its proceedings is lifted. "We'll litigate rigorously," Peter Chan, assistant regional director at the commission's Midwest regional office in Chicago, said in an interview. The SEC launched a lawsuit in a U.S. District Court in Illinois in 2004, accusing Black and others of engaging in a "fraudulent and deceptive scheme to divert cash and assets from Hollinger International. . . and to conceal their self-dealing." Chan said the suit will seek financial remedies including a civil penalty and "disgorgement of ill-gotten gains." The SEC will also seek to establish a voting trust to limit Black's ability to control Hollinger Inc., in which Black holds about a 50 per cent stake through holding company Ravelston Inc.; it also wants to bar Black from acting as a director or officer of a publicly-traded company. The SEC succeeded in doing that with Radler, Black's former top associate at the Hollinger group. In March, days before Black's criminal trial began, Radler agreed to pay US$28.7 million in an SEC settlement and was also barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company. Radler, the former deputy chairman and chief operating officer of Hollinger International, turned on his former boss and became a star prosecution witness in the criminal trial, in which Black and other officers of the former Hollinger newspaper empire were accused of illegally pocketing millions in so-called "non-compete" payments during the sale of some of the chain's assets. If the SEC's treatment of Radler is any indication, Black is not in for an easy ride. After Radler was convicted, Linda Chatman Thomsen, director of the commission's division of enforcement, said he "and others misappropriated millions of dollars from Hollinger International and made numerous misstatements to shareholders as part of their scheme." "The tough sanctions in this settlement, including one of the largest civil penalties in recent years against an individual wrongdoer, reflect our resolve to act forcefully against corporate officers who perpetrate fraud," Thomsen said. In the battery of civil suits, shareholders and companies formerly controlled by Black are seeking to recoup some of the losses they allege were incurred when Black was at the helm. Civil cases carry a lower burden of proof than criminal ones and there have been cases in which a defendant has been acquitted of criminal charges but lost a civil suit - most famously that of former football star O.J. Simpson, who was judged not guilty of murdering his ex-wife and her friend but later found liable for their deaths in a civil trial. The pending civil suits involving Black include a US$542-million suit by Sun-Times Media Group Inc., a US$700-million suit filed by Hollinger Inc. (TSX:HLG.C) and a claim by Sotheby's International Realty Inc. that Black owes US$557,000 in commission on the sale of a New York apartment. Institutional investors, including major Sun-Times Media shareholder Cardinal Capital Management of Greenwich, Conn., are involved in several suits, including a Chicago-based lawsuit alleging federal securities violations, filed by a group including a Louisiana teachers' pension fund. Canadian retail investors have launched a $4-billion class-action lawsuit against Black, his wife Barbara Amiel, Radler and others alleging they suffered market losses that may have been caused by the controversies surrounding Black's management. Black himself has filed a libel suit seeking C$1.1 billion in damages against members of Hollinger International's board, which produced a 2004 report accusing him of looting the company and a claim seeking nearly $20.6 million plus interest relating to money he paid to Sun-Times Media Group in 2004. He's also launched a libel suit against British author Tom Bower, who infuriated the Blacks with his book "Conrad & Lady Black: Dancing on the Edge," seeking $11 million. If after serving jail time, Black may try to reintegrate himself into society by regaining Canadian citizenship, which he renounced in 2001 to become a British peer and sit in the House of Lords. Some pending civil lawsuits and regulatory and legal actions involving Conrad Black: Others vs. Black -Sun-Times Media Group Inc., formerly Hollinger International, is suing Black for US$542 million, accusing him and other former executives of stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from the company. Suit alleges they engaged in racketeering, allowing the company to seek triple damages under U.S. anti-corruption laws. -Toronto-based Hollinger Inc. (TSX:HLG.C) is suing Black, claiming damages of more than US$700 million, including breach of contract, conspiracy, unjust enrichment and unlawful interference with Hollinger's economic interest. -Sotheby's International Realty Inc. claims Black owes US$557,000 in commission on the sale of his Park Avenue apartment. -U.S. institutional investor Cardinal Capital is involved in several suits against Black's companies, including a Chicago-based lawsuit alleging federal securities violations filed by a group including a Louisiana teachers' pension fund. -Canadian investors have launched $4-billion class-action lawsuit against Black, his wife Barbara Amiel Black, David Radler and others, alleging they suffered market losses that may have been caused by the controversies surrounding Black's management. Black vs. others -Black has filed a libel suit in Ontario against members of the Hollinger International board committee, which produced a 2004 report accusing him of looting the company. Seeking $1.1 billion in damages. -Black is seeking $20.6 million plus interest relating to money he paid to Sun-Times Media Group in July 2004. Hollinger Inc., which was formerly controlled by Black and which retains an equity and voting interest in Sun-Times Media Group, said in December it disputes Black's claim for damages and "believes that, in any event, it has a valid basis for offsetting any successful claim by Black against various amounts it has claimed from Black." -Black is suing the U.S. government, claiming the Federal Bureau of Investigation improperly seized US$9 million from the sale of his Park Avenue apartment. -Black has an outstanding an $11-million libel suit against British author Tom Bower, claiming his book "Conrad & Lady Black: Dancing on the Edge," is "vindictive, high-handed, contemptuous, sadistic, pathologically mendacious and malicious."
On Friday a Chicago jury found Conrad Black guilty of obstruction of justice and three counts of mail fraud. Black was, however, acquitted of using company funds to subsidise his personal life.

Conrad Black could face up to 35 years in prison having been found guilty of obstruction of justice and three counts of mail fraud. Black was acquitted of using $20 million of company funds to subsidise his personal life despite all the pre-trial speculation about how a jury in blue-collar Chicago would react negatively to his extravagant lifestyle, Black’s conviction on obstruction of justice was almost inevitable considering the CCTV footage that showed him removing 13 boxes from his office despite a court order not to. The counts of mail fraud related to non-compete agreements which Black and various associates had inserted when selling several of Hollinger’s community newspapers between 1998 and 2001. Much of the money from these agreements—up to $60 million—went, improperly, to Hollinger executives rather than the company itself. No head of a public company will ever again dare to behave in the publicly ostentatious fashion that Black did. Partly this is because of the new, stricter corporate governance environment that has arisen in the US following the collapse of Enron in 2001 and the subsequent introduction of Sarbanes Oxley in 2002. But the rise of activist shareholders also means that chief executives are now being more forcefully held to account. We haven’t heard the last from Black, though. He is expected to appeal the verdict
Conrad Black Prosecution Enron Byproduct By DAVE CARPENTER AP Business Writer CHICAGO (AP) -- Attorneys for Conrad Black assured jurors as his corporate fraud trial opened in March that the case involving the former media tycoon and British lord was not another Enron. It wasn't. But Enron turned out to be inextricably linked to his downfall. A federal court jury's convictions of Black and three other former executives of Hollinger International Inc. on Friday signaled the latest in a series of triumphs by government prosecutors in an Enron-inspired crackdown on corporate crime that began five years ago this month. If not for the widespread outrage generated by the Houston energy company's scandal, which left thousands jobless and wiped out billions of dollars in market value and employee pension plans, legal experts say Black and his cohorts likely would have gotten away with their crimes. "On an order of magnitude, this case doesn't compare to Enron or WorldCom," said Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor who represents companies and individuals accused of white-collar crimes. "But ... it's another example of federal prosecutors aggressively pursuing a once-powerful CEO and successfully convincing jurors that his conduct amounted to an intentional fraud." "That's not an easy thing to do," he said. "Five years ago, that was almost unthinkable." Amid anger and frustration at scandals from the dot-com era involving Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and other corporations, Washington took two major steps in July 2002 to try to minimize corporate misdeeds. The White House created a corporate fraud task force to root out and prosecute white-collar criminals - a mission Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill likened at the time to the work of mob-buster Eliot Ness. Congress and President Bush then teamed up three weeks later in the toughest crackdown on boardroom fraud since the Depression, setting stringent new standards for all U.S. public company boards, management and public accounting firms in the form of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. After five years of catching executives in those nets, the rate of corporate convictions has slowed, due in part to the higher levels of accountability and scrutiny. But prosecutors continue to go after such cases aggressively when evidence surfaces. "There's no doubt that beginning a few years back - and particularly Enron focused people's attention on it - there's a grave concern with integrity and making sure that corporate fraud is stamped out," U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald said following the Black convictions. "They're clearly a priority," he said of corporate crime cases. "And they became more of a priority a few years ago." At a time when shareholder lawsuits were proliferating, prosecutors got a big assist in the Hollinger case when a special committee of its board responded to angry stockholders by compiling a 500-page report in 2004 detailing how Black conspired with associates to loot the company of millions in bogus fees. The U.S. District Court jury in Chicago was convinced of enough key parts of the scheme to convict Black of three counts of fraud and one of obstruction of justice. The Canadian-born magnate now faces a maximum sentence of 35 years in prison and $1 million in fines, while associates Jack Boultbee, Peter Atkinson and Mark Kipnis could spend up to 15 years in prison with fines of $750,000. "Black got caught up in intensified Justice Department white-collar criminal activity and he suffered from it," said David Ruder, professor emeritus at Northwestern University of Law and a former chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Maybe it wouldn't have gotten to that point," he said, without the accelerated push against corporate crime. Bernard Harcourt, a professor of law at the University of Chicago Law School, said Black's case differs from Enron because it wasn't about him running Hollinger with pervasive, fraudulent behavior. "I would view this more as the greedy CEO who is just trying to stuff his pockets at the end of what was a pretty successful career," he said. Black will be sentenced Nov. 30. However, while he likely won't face terms as long as those of convicted CEOs Jeffrey Skilling of Enron (24 years, 4 months) or Bernard Ebbers of WorldCom (25 years), the verdict showed that Enron's legacy remains alive. "Although the unprecedented wave of major corporate prosecutions has abated, this verdict is further evidence that jurors are still willing to dissect complex allegations and buy into the government's theories that tie the person at the very top of the corporate hierarchy to serious misconduct," said Mintz.
 AP Photo/Pat Sullivan
In Conrad Black case, jury unable to reach verdict but keeps trying
CHICAGO: After nine days of deliberations, the jury deciding the criminal case against Conrad Black, the former chairman of the newspaper empire Hollinger International, told a U.S. judge that it could not reach a verdict on all charges in the case against Black and his co-defendants. So Judge Amy St. Eve sent the jury back Tuesday with instructions to keep deliberating the fate of Black and his former colleagues, who have been on trial for much of the last four months. Black, 62, has been charged with more than a dozen counts of mail and wire fraud and obstruction of justice in the case, which began with jury selection in mid-March. He is on trial along with Hollinger's former chief financial officer, John Boultbee; a former vice president, Peter Atkinson; and a former Hollinger lawyer, Mark Kipnis. They are accused of swindling Hollinger shareholders out of more than $60 million. The other three defendants are charged with various counts of mail and tax fraud. The jurors' note to St. Eve said that they were unable to reach a verdict on all counts in the case. The note, which said that the jury had carefully weighed the nearly 80 pages of jury instructions, read: "We have discussed and deliberated on all the evidence and are still unable to reach a unanimous verdict on one or more counts. Please advise." Lawyers for both sides were summoned to the court and, after consultation, St. Eve ordered the jury to continue the deliberations that began after closing arguments ended June 27. St. Eve told the panel to make "every reasonable effort" to reach a verdict in the case, which has drawn media attention from across the globe. Legal experts said it was not unusual for juries in complicated cases, especially those involving detailed financial dealings, to have difficulty reaching a verdict. The judge, in most cases, asks the jury to persevere. Ronald Safer, a lawyer for Kipnis, argued that the jury should be allowed to return whatever verdict it had reached, even if, in this case, it was a nonverdict. He later said that he was not seeking a mistrial, but was simply asking the judge to allow the jury to return the verdict they saw fit. Prosecutors told St. Eve on Tuesday that the jury should be granted more time, and that a partial verdict should be allowed. July 11, 2007TTC Sad, Disasters Bad, Avril Mad
The TTC can’t win for losing. Ridership is up but revenues are down as more riders choose weekly or monthly passes, and the TTC is looking for more money from the city to accommodate the surge. Damn those Metropass holders, riding around like they own the place. After nine days of deliberations, the jury in the Conrad Black case has announced that they’ve been unable to reach a verdict. Judge Amy St. Eve told them to go back and deliberate again until they did. The jury said that’s what we were trying to do. The judge said well you better go try some more. We’ll keep you posted on this riveting courtroom drama.
The World Conference on Disaster Management wraps up today at the Toronto Convention Centre. Torontoist would go but we’re locked in the basement with a tire iron and a two-year supply of Beefaroni. In related news, Avril Lavigne has lashed out at critics who say she doesn’t write her own songs. She’s quoted in the Globe as saying, "All songs share similar lyrics and emotions. As humans we speak one language." Avril claims to be fluent in Humanese. Photo by SirCharlie in the Torontoist Flickr Pool. Associated PressConrad Black Jury Ends DeliberationsAssociated Press 07.11.07
Jurors deliberating fraud charges against former media magnate Conrad Black and three other executives quietly went about their business Wednesday, then went home without a verdict, one day after telling a judge they were deadlocked. Legal observers had speculated that some kind of verdict - or a hung jury - was imminent after jurors sent a note to U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve on Tuesday saying they had "discussed and deliberated on all the evidence and are still unable to reach an unanimous verdict on one or more counts." "Please advise," it added. St. Eve responded by urging jurors to continue working toward an unanimous decision. Jurors deliberated a full day Wednesday and sent only one note to say they'd be back to work Thursday morning. Black, 62, and three other defendants have pleaded not guilty to swindling shareholders in the Hollinger International Inc. (nyse: HLR - news - people ) newspaper empire out of more than $60 million. Black faces 13 criminal counts, including mail fraud, wire fraud and racketeering. He faces a maximum penalty of 101 years in federal prison if convicted on all counts against him, though lawyers have said a sentence of that length is unlikely. The trial began March 20, and Wednesday marked the 10th day of jury deliberations.
Is this Black fan club for real? There are 459 entries on the Facebook page - but does Conrad have that many friends?
CHICAGO -- What to do when you live in the Conrad Black Zoo, where any information is feeding time? It's not the jury that is caged up as much as it is the media, lawyers and defendants waiting for those 12 regular American citizens to lock him up or set him free. Every time someone's BlackBerry goes off it's like rattling the cage of the starved pack. DOMINOES As reporters and camera people remain in a pen with nothing but hours to count, some reporters are playing dominoes in the hallways. Or we can always check out the Conrad Black Fan Club group on Facebook.
Facebook seems to be all the rage these days. Now I am not going to go out on a limb and say it's real, but there is a Conrad Black Fan Club page on the social-networking site and there seems to be 459 people signed on as friends. Does Conrad Black have that many friends? I mean, that many friends who would be hanging out on Facebook? I already learned my lesson on this stuff from Frank magazine, which pulled a classic gag before this trial got started and tricked media into reporting about a Conrad Black legal defence fund run by the fictional Bay Streeter named Alastair Smith. I darned near ran an e-mail interview I did with this phantom only to get that feeling this was a prank. It was. A doozy in fact. Even Lord Black fell for it and invited this group to his home. They sent over a cake with a saw on top instead. But who knows -- maybe this thing is legit. However, the thing that makes me suspicious about this website is the appearance of a Free Conrad yellow ribbon - something the other phoney Frank campaign created. Although the Facebook version does indicate the ribbon was from the Frank ruse, it still says it's "nonetheless a good thing to print, laminate and wear." Not me. The yellow ribbon I wear is for our troops in Afghanistan and other missions around the world. It's not for Conrad Black, and I know as a military historian himself, Black would not approve of this. But still, fact or fiction, the site is worth checking out and perhaps some of the people really are fans. It says its core values are as follows: "Anyone who loves liberty, freedom of expression, healthy political debate and diversity of the press - principles for which Lord Black has stood all his life." It also calls on support from "those who oppose America's current envy-driven witch- hunt of the wealthy and successful" and "those who oppose judicial tyranny, corporate governance terrorism and heavy-handed prosecutorial tactics such as gratuitous pre-trial asset seizures and defamatory press leaks." There are many postings on the site - complete with pictures of the people who are said to have uploaded them. A lot of them seem young - like university students and not Conrad's peers. It also boasts a message from Black and adds: "Yes it was actually written by the real Conrad Black just for this Facebook group." "After more than three years of this ordeal, with relentless efforts to strangle me financially and defame me to the point of notoriety and ostracism having failed, it is very gratifying to see the entire false persecution crumbling," it quotes someone claiming to be Lord Black. THE LORD'S ENGLISH Sounds like the Lord's English I must say, but then below it also says "related groups" to this page include "Conservative Party of Canada, The Andrew Coyne Fan Club, Blogging Tories, The Stephen Harper Fan Club and Socialism Sucks!" I have a call out to the creators to see if this site is real. So far I have not found a David Radler Facebook fan page. Perhaps on Day 10 with nothing to do, that's how I will kill my time in the Conrad Black Zoo.
|
|
|